March 24, 2008

Is Credit Monitoring the Best Way to Protect Your Identity?

Filed under: Identity Blog — Craig @ 6:39 am

According to Javelin Strategy and Research about 24 million customers have signed up for credit monitoring services. For $60-$180 per year, Experian, Equifax and TransUnion state they can protect you from identity theft by regularly watching for changes in your credit report. Unfortunately, credit monitoring is overrated and overpriced.

  1. Credit Monitoring often only monitors one credit bureau. Since creditors don’t always report to all three credit bureaus, you may be missing out on important notifications.
  2. Speed of notification is a problem. Some credit monitoring services report only once per week. In addition, delays in reporting information by the credit bureaus means notifications could take up to 45 days to go out. Consumers need information quickly if their identities are in jeopardy.
  3. Credit monitoring is reactive and not proactive. It doesn’t stop the issuance of credit to an identity thief. It only notifies you that someone has opened an account in your name or has inquired about credit in your name.

Reviewing your Credit Reports, adding Fraud Alerts to your credit files and Credit Card/Social Security Number Monitoring are much more effective ways to prevent identity theft.

Instead of paying for credit monitoring, do the monitoring yourself by ordering copies of your credit report from all three credit bureaus (Experian, Equifax and TransUnion) and review them carefully. There can be significant differences between your reports at the three bureaus, depending on which bureau each of your creditors report to.

Four months after ordering your first bureau report, order a copy of your report from the next bureau, and four months after that, the third credit bureau. This way, you get a free copy every four months. Review the reports carefully for any unexpected activity or accounts you don’t recognize.

Adding a fraud alerts to your credit report warns potential creditors to contact you by phone before granting credit in your name. Would you rather

  1. Get a phone call from a credit asking if you applied for credit or
  2. Wait to get an email from a credit monitoring service letting you know an account has been opened in your name?

I think the answer is obvious.

Lastly, none of the credit monitoring services offers proactive monitoring of social security numbers and credit card. The latest identity theft prevention technology scourers internet chat rooms, FTP sites, and other directories and sites for signs of social security number and credit card number fraud. A recent Gartner Group consulting firm report states that this type of monitoring may “overtake credit-report monitoring as an effective identity theft tool by year-end 2009.” See our premium identity protect for more details on this technology.

Without a charge, freeIDENTITYprotect will guide you through the easy steps to access your free credit reports and will notify you every 4 months that it is time to order a new report. The service will also help you add a fraud alert to your credit report and will notify you when it is time to renew it.

4 Comments »

  1. I just stopped by your blog and thought I would say hello. I like your site design. Looking forward to reading more down the road.

    Robert Michel

    Comment by Robert Michel — March 24, 2008 @ 7:00 am

  2. Good Blog. I will continue reading it in the future. Nice layout too.

    Aaron Wakling

    Comment by Aaron Wakling — March 24, 2008 @ 7:30 am

  3. If everyone registers their fingerprints with government (i.e. passport agency) and every financial institution and potential employment require finger prints comparison (biometrics), and then identity theft would be a thing of the past. Those who object being fingerprinted claiming “an invasion of privacy”, must have something to hide or to discourage others because of potentially harming their own fraudulent activities.

    Comment by David — March 25, 2008 @ 1:50 pm

  4. Welcome Robert, Aaron and David to my blog. Thanks for your comments.

    David, biometrics is prohibitively expensive for the type of application you are referring to. Further, If the audit processes at companies is not improved and they just blindly use biometrics as a cure all, no meaningful improvement to this problem is achieved. At some point, the cost of biometrics will decrease and we will see it more widely used.

    Did you know many airports today such as JFK, Amsterdam, Orlando Intl, Britian’s Manchester, Frankfort airport all use iris scanning to look for people. You can be walking to catch your flight, and have your iris scanned and never know it happened to you.

    The second issue is that much of the identity theft occurring in the United States occurs from outside our borders. Adding biometrics for all American residents won’t help you there, nor will it help you with those that are in the US and undocumented.

    Comment by Craig Muller — March 28, 2008 @ 1:09 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

A DIVISION OF
HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.